학술논문
Beliefs vs. Science in the Climate Change Debate: Richard Bean’s The Heretic
이용수 20
- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 한국영미어문학회
- 저자명
- Heebon Park
- 간행물 정보
- 『영미어문학』영미어문학 제139호, 165~185쪽, 전체 21쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2020.12.30
국문 초록
영문 초록
Richard Bean’s dark comedy The Heretic (2011) is a unique instance of a science-on-stage play that addresses climate change from a skeptical perspective. In contrast to other environmental plays, which warn of an anthropogenic crisis aggravated by the failure of governments to take meaningful action, Bean presents his own rejection of established findings regarding sea level rise through his main character, a Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics professor in a university in the north of England. Dr. Diane Cassell echoes the claims of Nils-Axel Mörner, a controversial scientist whose work has been discredited by experts and environmental institutions. Research ethics, academic duplicity, and religious attitudes to climate change all come under the magnifying glass in the play, as Diane’s Head of Faculty asks her to delay publishing research that would prevent them from winning corporate sponsorship. A confrontational mother-daughter relationship also features as a metaphor for Diane’s rejection of scientific consensus, though Bean’s characteristic use of comedy forestalls any attempt at preaching or lecturing the audience. Despite the lack of technical information and the unconvincing ending, The Heretic provides a timely warning about conflicts of interest, misinterpretation of data, and political expediency, on both sides of the climate change debate.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Setting the Scene
3. Issue-Driven Science and Beliefs
4. Conclusion
Works Cited
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!