공정거래법상 ‘부당한 공동행위’ 규제의 합리적 개선방안

• 영문명: Cartel Regulation Reforms in Korean Antitrust Law
• 발행기관: 개인저작물
• 저자명: 정완(Choung, Wan)
• 간행물 정보: 『개인저작물 - 법학·행정』제42권 제3호, 235~266쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 개인저작물
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2007.12.01

영문 초록

Cartels are considered one of the most powerful instruments for avoiding competition in the market. Accordingly, regulation of cartels is key to competition law anywhere, including Korea. Article 19(1) of the Korean Competition Act defines a cartel as any agreement that restricts competition, regardless of its form, among businesses, through engagement in the activities stipulated in the statute. Given that the most difficult problem in the regulation of cartels is the procurement of evidence showing the required agreement, the author here analyses the method b which such agreements are proven under the Act through both direct and indirect (circumstantial) evidence. Inference by law of the required agreement, an element peculiar to the Korean Competition Act, is also analysed. The author next takes up the issue of limitations on the `justified behavior` exception for activities that are `in accordance with other legislation.` Despite strict interpretation of the exception clauses to the Competition Act by the Korean competition authority and the courts, there remains a significant gray area where the demarcation line for illegality is not clearly drawn. Both lawyers and government authorities have yet to suggest any clear standards for a determination of illegality that is based on administrative guidance. The Korean competition authority should consider developing specific guidelines to resolve these uncertainties. The author then discusses remedies for competition violations, including both corrective measures and administrative fines. The author argues that among the various remedies, the public notice of violation order, intended to secure compliance by means of dishonor and damage to business reputation, or the reputation of other violators, contains the inherent danger of infringement upon personal dignity, credit, and privacy. Efficient investigation for effective cartel regulation depends on the ability to secure evidence of the cartel agreement. To aid in this regard, the Korean Competition Act has introduced a leniency program for voluntary reporting and cooperation (Article 22(2)). This new system is expected to contribute to the strengthening of cartel regulation in Korea.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며

Ⅱ. 부당한 공동행위의 개념과 유형

Ⅲ. 공정거래위원회의 사건처리 실태

Ⅳ. 부당한 공동행위의 규제의 주요내용

Ⅴ. 합리적 규제를 위한 개선방안

Ⅵ. 맺음말

참고문헌

키워드

공정거래법 부당한 공동행위 경쟁제한 공정거래위원회 공정거래 동의명령 개선방안 Cartel Antitrust Law Restriction of Competition Remedy Leniency Awards for Report The Fair Trade Committee