15세기 ‘하낭다’체와 16세기 ‘하내’체의 기능 비교를 통한 관련 여부 탐색

• 영문명: A Study on the Relationship between ‘Hanangda’ in the 15th Century and ‘Hane’ in the 16th Century
• 발행기관: 한국언어문학회
• 저자명: 양영희(Yang Younghee)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국언어문학』한국언어문학 제55집, 31~50쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 한국어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2005.10.01

영문 초록

This study aims to show that ‘hanangda’ in the 15th century and ‘hane’ in the 16th century are considered ‘polite informal style’ and the latter has the same function as the former. The conclusion is as follows. First of all, ‘hanangda’ and ‘hane’ are considered ‘polite style’ in that they have the polite mark ‘ee.’ It is known that ‘ee’ is the most objective mark to show ‘polite style.’ Therefore, the hierarchy of ‘being polite’ has to be divided into ‘polite style’ and ‘impolite style,’ and ‘hanangda’ and ‘hane’ belong to the category of the former because they have the mark. Second, ‘hanangda’ and ‘hane’ are informal style. It is impossible to talk about hierarchy without thinking of ‘being formal/informal’ because it is likely to use different style to the same people according to the situation and place. So, ‘hanaida’ style is regarded as ‘formal style’ that states the difference of the social status of the speaker and listener, while ‘hanangda’ and ‘hane’ style are regarded as ‘informal style’ that expresses one's emotion subjectively. Third, as mentioned above, we came to the conclusion that ‘hane’ style in the sixteenth century is the developed form of ‘hanangda’ style in the fifteenth century. In other word, it is inferred that ‘hanangda’ style in the fifteenth century was ‘polite informal style,’ but in the sixteenth century it was transformed to ‘hane’ style and functioned as the same continuously.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. ‘하낭다’체와 ‘하내’체의 기능 비교

Ⅲ. 맺음말

참고문헌

Abstract

저자소개