2003년도 언론관련판례로 살펴 본 ‘표현의 자유의 범위와 한계’

• 영문명: Critical Analysis of Cases related freedom of expression from Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Korea in 2003
• 발행기관: 한국헌법학회
• 저자명: 박선영(Park Sun-Young)
• 간행물 정보: 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第10卷 第4號, 265~304쪽, 전체 40쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2004.12.01

영문 초록

The extent of protection regarding freedom of expression is not clearly defined in korean constitutional law(Art. 21). In the past, in korea, the media law provided and judicial precedents ruled that freedom of broadcasting and in cyberspace should be regulated and protected at the least extent in an different way from print media for several reasons. In short, the different levels of protection between media have had persuasive reasoning power. But last year the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court confirmed in several cases that in the 21th century all the media have to protected under the freedom of speech clause in the korean constitutional law in spite of the media's specific characteristics. However the extent and ground of protection are not clear yet. All the type of speech and press relate to self-fulfillment and political procedures in the modern democratic societies with an informational values for individual intelligence and establishment of constitutional system. On thinking the constitutional guarantees to individuals the right of free expression which are essential and intrinsic values for all human beings and modern society is the ultimate objective of constitutional protection. As long as people can get diverse ideas through all kinds of media, the truth can be found. This paper is to review the cases related freedom of expression from Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Korea in 2003. This article would be helpful to achieve the legal climate for enhance individual's freedom of expression.

목차

Ⅰ. 표현의 자유와 헌법 제21조

Ⅱ. 방송의 자유와 채널사용권

Ⅲ. 公人에 대한 명예훼손의 法理

Ⅳ. 명예훼손과 인신공격의 구분

Ⅴ. 가상공간에서의 표현의 자유

Ⅵ. 표현의 자유와 공직선거

Ⅶ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract