- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 한국생성문법학회
- 저자명
- Sun-Woong Kim
- 간행물 정보
- 『생성문법연구』제31권 제2호, 273~308쪽, 전체 36쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 언어학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2021.05.30
7,120원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
This paper explores how the definite interpretation is derived in articleless languages. The first half of the paper discusses the existence/absence of D across languages and compares some aritcleless languages with respect to its strength. The discussion is centered around several prominent properties: left branch extraction, radical pro-drop, subject-object asymmetries, Neg-raising, focus-verb adjacency, focus morphology on negative constituents, and majority reading of superlatives. The discussions strongly lead us to the conclusion that Korean is an NP-language. In line with Syed and Simpson’s (2017) claim that word order does not necessarily require DP-structure in the relevant language, this paper argues that definite interpretations can come from many sources (Phan and Lander 2015). The second half discusses on how definite and indefinite interpretations are semantically derived from bare nominal expressions in articleless languages such as Korean and Hindi, and leads to the conclusion that both Korean and Hindi bare nominals produce the same patterns of ambiguities such as generic, definite, and non-specific indefinite readings. Our proposals to account for the occurrence of such ambiguities are summarized as follows: (i) Bare singular forms are a representative of bare nominals. (ii) Bare nominals are identified as non-indefiniteness in terms of such diagnostics as anaphoricity, homogeneity, partitive specificity, referential specificity, and scope inertness phenomena, since they neither take intermediate scope nor obligatorily take narrow scope, as opposed to genuine indefinites. (iii) Bare nominals cannot introduce new entities into the discourse, since they are simply definites. (iv) Bare nominals can denote kinds (generics) when combined with a kind-level predicate. (v) The perceived indefiniteness of bare nominals can be derived from complex predicate formation or in the non-topic situation where definite readings fail to arise.
목차
1. Introduction
2. D in NP-languages?
3. (In)definiteness in Articleless Languages from Semantic Perspectives
4. Definiteness of Bare nominals
5. Kind (Generic) Readings of Bare nominals
6. When Definiteness Fails but Indefinite Readings Arise
7. Summary and Conclusion
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
인문학 > 언어학분야 BEST
더보기인문학 > 언어학분야 NEW
- Principles, challenges, and prospects in classifying Russian parts of speech
- Semantic taxonomy and nominal coordination in Vietnamese
- Index as a syntactic object: Evidence from Korean
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
